Harvard's Fake Guide to Fake News Sites

14/03/2017 4 min arretsurinfo.ch #126234  français

The sites stigmatised by Harvard are the best indication of where to find real news, as opposed to the globalist propaganda organs The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc. Note how the NATO propaganda organs in the US and Europe are, as usual, all following the same script: their current joint task is to warn innocent readers against the danger of straying from the official news path. The stigmatised sites, in contrast, offer variety. You are free to pick and choose. [D. J].

Harvard's Fake Guide to Fake News Sites

by Stephen Lendman

Is this what parents pay $63,000 annually for tuition, room, board and fees - so their children can be ill-served and ill-taught?

Following the 2014 Obama administration Kiev coup, replacing democracy with fascist dictatorship, Harvard expressed concern about nonexistent "Russian aggression.” Some faculty members called for US military intervention.

Not a word about US-supported putschists seizing power. Nothing about the most brazen European coup since Mussolini's 1922 march on Rome.

No explanation about a scheme orchestrated in Washington. Silence about a major crisis in Europe's heartland still ongoing. Trump inherited Obama's mess, so far not indicating clearly where he stands on Ukraine.

Harvard is at it again. It's guides.library.harvard.edu published a fake guide to "fake news, misinformation, and propaganda.”

It recommends using FactCheck.org, Politifact, Snopes.com, Washington Post Fact Checker, and other self-styled fact-checkers, biased against truth-telling on all major issues, acting as censors, trashing reliable alternative sources of news, information and analysis.

It endorses sanitized content acceptable to America's deep state, abandoning support for speech, media and academic freedoms.

It recommended "tips for analyzing news sources.” Ignore them. Common sense is the best guide, along with distrusting and avoiding media scoundrels. They're paid to lie, deceive and feature fake news - what powerful interests want people to know, what's most important suppressed.

Harvard published a list of hundreds of sites it calls "bias(ed),” "conspira(torial),” "unreliable,” "fake,” and otherwise mislabeled.

Some I'm familiar with are reliable sources, (polar opposite media scoundrels paid to lie), including:

21st Century Wire
Activist Post
Antiwar.com
Before Its News.com
Black Agenda Report
Boiling Frogs Post
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Corbett Report
Countercurrents
CounterPunch
David Stockman Contracorner
Fort Russ
Freedoms Phoenix
Global Research
The Greanville Post
Information Clearing House
Intellihub
Intrepid Report
Lew Rockwell
Market Oracle
Mint Press News
Moon of Alabama
Naked Capitalism
Natural News
Nomi Prins
Off-Guardian
Paul Craig Roberts
Pravda.ru
Rense
Rinf
Ron Paul Institute
Ruptly TV
Russia-Insider
Sgt Report
ShadowStats
Shift Frequency
SJLendman.blogspot.com - my alma mater recommends avoiding my writing; new articles posted daily; featuring truth-telling on major issues
Solari
Sott.net
South Front
Sputnik News
Strategic Culture.org
The Anti-Media
The Duran
The Intercept
The People's Voice
The Saker
The Sleuth Journal
Third World Traveler
Voltairenet
What Really Happened
Who What Why
WikiLeaks
Zero Hedge

These and other sites Harvard's Library urges avoiding are ones readers should rely on - avoiding The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and other fake news proliferators.

Stephen Lendman |MARCH 13, 2017

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled « Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III. » claritypress.com

Source: sjlendman.blogspot.ch

arretsurinfo.ch

 commentaire